No joke, this basic pay stub came in handy when a screenshot was no longer good enough for my archive. I checked the date and pay period on both my laptop and a printed draft. I checked the date and pay period one more time before saving. In the end, the layout felt practical instead of overdesigned.
Customer feedback · Page 3 of 13
What customers say after creating a document.
Browse published feedback across PayStubCheck paystubs, earnings statements, expense reports, W-2, 1099, and Canadian document tools—including critical reviews, not only five-star comments.
The full picture
Filter the feedback that matters to you.
A five-star average alone does not tell you whether a tool fits your situation. Search the actual review text, isolate a document type, compare ratings, or narrow feedback by state or province before choosing where to begin.
PayStubCheck customer reviews — page 3
A routine check of the employer information made me decide to create a cleaner detailed pay stub; I used a second screen to compare the employer information with the original copy, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot, so I filed it with the rest of my records.
During my Thursday lunch break, for real, I used the earnings statement for cleaning up payroll records after the previous version looked uneven on my printer; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the line-by-line totals, and the spacing held up even with longer entries, so my notes finally match the document on file.
Kinda wild, one messy printout was enough to convince me to remake the advanced pay stub; I went line by line through the gross-to-net calculation before filing the result, and nothing shifted in the saved PDF, so the clean copy will be much easier to review later.
A routine check of the employee details made me decide to create a cleaner simple pay stub. I used a second screen to compare the employee details with the original copy, and the finished file was ready to archive right away.
I was already working on reviewing a household budget, and the earnings statement was the last piece I needed; I checked the gross and net figures once before export and once after, and the document opened normally on my phone and laptop, so the went into the training folder that afternoon; the toatls matched the original record.
Way easier, my goal was basic: make a readable detailed pay stub for running an internal quality check; I compared the deductions section with my spreadsheet before archiving the file, and the important figures were easy to scan, so that saved me from keeping another blurry screenshot.
I needed a clean basic pay stub because a faded printout turned up in my files; I copied the figures from the original record and checked the employee section twice, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot, so I filed it with the rest of my records.
I wanted the gross-to-net calculation to be easier to review, which is why I tried the advanced pay stub. I went line by line through the gross-to-net calculation before filing the result, and the preview caught a small entry mistake before I saved.
The department fields was the part I cared about most when I put this advanced pay stub together; I entered the data slowly, then reopened the PDF to inspect the department fields, and the printout stayed readable without wasting space, so the second print looked exactly the way I wanted.
On Friday morning, I used the earnings statement for reviewing a household budget after I needed a fresh copy for a procedure guide; I compared the preview with my notes before saving the gross and net figures, and the preview caught a small entry mistake before I saved, so I was done in one sitting.
What I needed was a straightforward advanced pay stub, not a complicated template. I printed a test page and marked the multiple earnings lines with a pencil, and the spacing held up even with longer entries.
For preparing an internal presentation, I wanted a advanced pay stub that would print without anything shifting. I reviewed the longest fields first so the detailed deductions would not wrap oddly. In the end, the whole cleanup took less time than expected.
I used the advanced pay stub for preparing an internal presentation after the old copy stopped being practical; I checked the multiple earnings lines once before export and once after, the first print came out small until I changed the scaling, and the clean copy was much easier to review than the old screenshot.
Kinda wild, i wanted the gross and net totals to be easier to review, which is why I tried the simple pay stub. I went line by line through the gross and net totals before filing the result, and nothing shifted in the saved PDF.
Pretty solid, i opened the simple pay stub template to finish testing payroll data without rebuilding everything in a spreadsheet; I used a second screen to compare the employee details with the original copy, and the finished file was ready to archive right away, so I would use the same setup for another internal test.
Super easy, i used the simple pay stub for replacing a faded personal copy after the old copy stopped being practical; I checked the deductions once before export and once after, and the document opened normally on my phone and laptop, so the went into the training folder that afternoon.
A routine check of the multiple earnings lines made me decide to create a cleaner advanced pay stub; I checked the multiple earnings lines on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot, so I filed it with the rest of my records.
I was already working on organizing several months of records, and the detailed pay stub was the last piece I needed; I reviewed the longest fields first so the deductions section would not wrap oddly, and the clean copy was much easier to review than the old screenshot, so the file held up when I reopened it on another device.
This earnings statement came in handy when a screenshot was no longer good enough for my archive. I copied the figures from the original record and checked the line-by-line totals twice, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot.
Tbh, the old copy had become a pain to read, so I rebuilt the detailed pay stub from the original figures; I kept the original beside me while reviewing the gross-to-net breakdown, and the clean copy was much easier to review than the old screenshot, so the file held up when I reopened it on another device.
After dinner on Friday, I used the basic pay stub for testing an older printer after the previous version looked uneven on my printer; I entered the data slowly, then reopened the PDF to inspect the print layout, and the printout stayed readable without wasting space, so the second print looked exactly the way I wanted; I checked it becuase the old one was blurry.
I tried the expense report after realizing a screenshot was no longer good enough for my archive; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the final PDF, and the result was tidy enough for the training folder, so I finished the task sooner than expected.
A routine check of the withholding fields made me decide to create a cleaner W-2 ; I checked the withholding fields on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the layout felt practical instead of overdesigned, so the final result was easy to archive.
Feedback by document
Start with the product you are considering.
Open a filtered review view, then follow the document link inside any review card when you are ready to examine that generator.
Review transparency
What the labels on this page mean.
The archive separates customer statements from PayStubCheck’s own representations. A customer’s experience does not guarantee that a document will be accepted by a landlord, lender, employer, government agency, or another recipient.
The source feedback record is marked as a verified purchase. Reviews without that designation remain visible without the badge.
The product label shown with each review identifies the document recorded in the customer feedback.
Review text expresses the customer’s own experience. PayStubCheck does not promise identical results or third-party acceptance.