A cleaner simple pay stub made sense once the old PDF had cramped text. I entered the data slowly, then reopened the pdf to inspect the employee details. In the end, the result was tidy enough for the training folder.
Customer feedback · Page 10 of 13
What customers say after creating a document.
Browse published feedback across PayStubCheck paystubs, earnings statements, expense reports, W-2, 1099, and Canadian document tools—including critical reviews, not only five-star comments.
The full picture
Filter the feedback that matters to you.
A five-star average alone does not tell you whether a tool fits your situation. Search the actual review text, isolate a document type, compare ratings, or narrow feedback by state or province before choosing where to begin.
PayStubCheck customer reviews — page 10
I was already working on building an internal training example, and the earnings statement was the last piece I needed; I checked the gross and net figures once before export and once after, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected, so it made the records cleanup less annoying.
I tried the earnings statement after realizing the old PDF had cramped text. I printed a test page and marked the hours and deductions with a pencil. In the end, the spacing held up even with longer entries.
A routine check of the print layout made me decide to create a cleaner basic pay stub; I used a second screen to compare the print layout with the original copy, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot, so I filed it with the rest of my records; the PDF looked the same accross two devices.
Before a Friday team meeting, I used the advanced pay stub for running a detailed payroll test after the previous version looked uneven on my printer; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the exported PDF, and the spacing held up even with longer entries, so my notes finally match the document on file.
For making a document QA , I wanted a advanced pay stub that would print without anything shifting. I kept the original beside me while reviewing the gross-to-net calculation, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected.
For running an internal quality check, I wanted a detailed pay stub that would print without anything shifting; I reviewed the longest fields first so the deductions section would not wrap oddly, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected, so it made the records cleanup less annoying.
Super easy, i was already working on reviewing a household budget, and the earnings statement was the last piece I needed. I checked the gross and net figures once before export and once after. In the end, the document opened normally on my phone and laptop; the toatls matched the original record.
I tried the detailed pay stub after realizing a training packet needed a more realistic ; I printed a test page and marked the year-to-date amounts with a pencil, and the result was tidy enough for the training folder, so I finished the task sooner than expected.
Way easier, my goal was basic: make a readable W-2 for updating an old training handout. I compared the wage boxes with my spreadsheet before archiving the file. In the end, the important figures were easy to scan.
Late in the workday, I used the advanced pay stub for running a detailed payroll test after a faded printout turned up in my files. I copied the figures from the original record and checked the exported pdf twice. In the end, the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot.
I wanted the net-pay line to be easier to review, which is why I tried the basic pay stub; I went line by line through the net-pay line before filing the result, and the preview caught a small entry mistake before I saved, so I was done in one sitting.
For making a bookkeeper training example, I wanted a simple pay stub that would print without anything shifting; I reviewed the longest fields first so the pay-period dates would not wrap oddly, and the document opened normally on my phone and laptop, so the went into the training folder that afternoon.
I used the earnings statement for building an internal training example after the old copy stopped being practical; I checked the gross and net figures once before export and once after, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected, so it made the records cleanup less annoying.
At the end of a long week, I used the 1099-NEC for building an internal QA file after I needed a cleaner page for an internal demo. I checked the payer details on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the layout felt practical instead of overdesigned.
For building a bookkeeping practice file, I wanted a Canadian pay stub that would print without anything shifting; I reviewed the longest fields first so the earnings and deductions would not wrap oddly, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected, so it made the records cleanup less annoying.
I used the expense report for making a clean copy from notes and receipts after the old copy stopped being practical; I checked the project categories once before export and once after, and the clean copy was much easier to review than the old screenshot, so the file held up when I reopened it on another device.
Kinda wild, i wanted the gross-to-net breakdown to be easier to review, which is why I tried the detailed pay stub. I went line by line through the gross-to-net breakdown before filing the result, and nothing shifted in the saved PDF.
I opened the advanced pay stub template to finish checking a complicated month against original records without rebuilding everything in a spreadsheet; I used a second screen to compare the department fields with the original copy, and the finished file was ready to archive right away, so I would use the same setup for another internal test; the process was straightfoward once I saw the preview.
I tried the advanced pay stub after realizing a faded printout turned up in my files; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the exported PDF, and the spacing held up even with longer entries, so my notes finally match the document on file.
I needed a clean advanced pay stub because a faded printout turned up in my files; I checked the multiple earnings lines on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the finished file was ready to archive right away, so I would use the same setup for another internal test.
This earnings statement came in handy when the original had a long employer name squeezed into one line. I used a second screen to compare the monthly earnings with the original copy, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot.
Honestly, this earnings statement came in handy when a screenshot was no longer good enough for my archive. I copied the figures from the original record and checked the line-by-line totals twice, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot.
Tbh, a routine check of the hours and deductions made me decide to create a cleaner earnings statement; I checked the hours and deductions on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the finished file was ready to archive right away, so I would use the same setup for another internal test; I kept a seperate copy for the archive.
Feedback by document
Start with the product you are considering.
Open a filtered review view, then follow the document link inside any review card when you are ready to examine that generator.
Review transparency
What the labels on this page mean.
The archive separates customer statements from PayStubCheck’s own representations. A customer’s experience does not guarantee that a document will be accepted by a landlord, lender, employer, government agency, or another recipient.
The source feedback record is marked as a verified purchase. Reviews without that designation remain visible without the badge.
The product label shown with each review identifies the document recorded in the customer feedback.
Review text expresses the customer’s own experience. PayStubCheck does not promise identical results or third-party acceptance.