I opened the advanced pay stub template to finish testing an example with more than one rate without rebuilding everything in a spreadsheet. I checked the multiple earnings lines on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the layout felt practical instead of overdesigned; I could recieve the file on my phone.
Customer feedback · Page 2 of 13
What customers say after creating a document.
Browse published feedback across PayStubCheck paystubs, earnings statements, expense reports, W-2, 1099, and Canadian document tools—including critical reviews, not only five-star comments.
The full picture
Filter the feedback that matters to you.
A five-star average alone does not tell you whether a tool fits your situation. Search the actual review text, isolate a document type, compare ratings, or narrow feedback by state or province before choosing where to begin.
PayStubCheck customer reviews — page 2
I used the earnings statement for testing a document layout after the old copy stopped being practical; I reviewed the longest fields first so the year-to-date totals would not wrap oddly, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected, so it made the records cleanup less annoying.
What I needed was a straightforward simple pay stub, not a complicated template; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the PDF spacing, and the spacing held up even with longer entries, so my notes finally match the document on file.
A cleaner detailed pay stub made sense once the margins were cut off on an older print; I printed a test page and marked the year-to-date amounts with a pencil, and the printout stayed readable without wasting space, so the second print looked exactly the way I wanted.
Pretty solid, this simple pay stub came in handy when a screenshot was no longer good enough for my archive; I used a second screen to compare the employee details with the original copy, and the finished file was ready to archive right away, so I would use the same setup for another internal test; the process was straightfoward once I saw the preview.
The old copy had become a pain to read, so I rebuilt the detailed pay stub from the original figures. I checked the hours and rate once before export and once after. In the end, the document opened normally on my phone and laptop.
A cleaner earnings statement made sense once the previous version looked uneven on my printer; I printed a test page and marked the hours and deductions with a pencil, and the result was tidy enough for the training folder, so I finished the task sooner than expected.
I tried the basic pay stub after realizing a screenshot was no longer good enough for my archive; I entered the data slowly, then reopened the PDF to inspect the print layout, and the spacing held up even with longer entries, so my notes finally match the document on file; the export workd on the first try.
During a quiet Wednesday morning, honestly, I used the simple pay stub for cleaning up a payroll archive after the old file opened differently on two devices; I copied the figures from the original record and checked the PDF spacing twice, and the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot, so I filed it with the rest of my records; the result was definately easier to read.
I was already working on building a training file with several earning types, and the advanced pay stub was the last piece I needed; I kept the original beside me while reviewing the department fields, the first print came out small until I changed the scaling, and the clean copy was much easier to review than the old screenshot; I kept a seperate copy for the archive.
I tried the simple pay stub after realizing a training packet needed a more realistic ; I entered the data slowly, then reopened the PDF to inspect the employee details, and the printout stayed readable without wasting space, so the second print looked exactly the way I wanted.
Lowkey, my goal was basic: make a readable expense report for testing a reimbursement process; I compared the preview with my notes before saving the project categories, and the preview caught a small entry mistake before I saved, so I was done in one sitting.
Late Wednesday afternoon, I used the detailed pay stub for making a bookkeeping lesson after a faded printout turned up in my files; I checked the year-to-date amounts on both my laptop and a printed draft, and the layout felt practical instead of overdesigned, so the final result was easy to archive.
I wanted the detailed deductions to be easier to review, which is why I tried the advanced pay stub; I compared the detailed deductions with my spreadsheet before archiving the file, and nothing shifted in the saved PDF, so the clean copy will be much easier to review later.
The final PDF was the part I cared about most when I put this detailed pay stub together; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the final PDF, and the spacing held up even with longer entries, so my notes finally match the document on file.
I used the 1099-MISC for preparing a classroom demo after the old copy stopped being practical; I kept the original beside me while reviewing the print layout, and the document opened normally on my phone and laptop, so the went into the training folder that afternoon.
I wanted the pay-period dates to be easier to review, which is why I tried the simple pay stub. I compared the pay-period dates with my spreadsheet before archiving the file. I checked the pay-period dates one more time before saving. In the end, the preview caught a small entry mistake before I saved.
Before work on Thursday, I used the Canadian pay stub for testing an office workflow after I was checking whether the totals matched my notes. I checked the year-to-date section once before export and once after, and the document opened normally on my phone and laptop.
I used the earnings statement for reviewing a household budget after the old copy stopped being practical; I kept the original beside me while reviewing the pay-period dates, and the whole cleanup took less time than expected, so it made the records cleanup less annoying.
Way easier, i wanted the wage boxes to be easier to review, which is why I tried the W-2 . I compared the wage boxes with my spreadsheet before archiving the file. In the end, the important figures were easy to scan.
I opened the detailed pay stub template to finish testing a payroll workflow without rebuilding everything in a spreadsheet. I copied the figures from the original record and checked the final pdf twice. I checked the final PDF one more time before saving. In the end, the final page looked clean and the totals were easy to spot.
I used the advanced pay stub for building a training file with several earning types after the old copy stopped being practical; I kept the original beside me while reviewing the gross-to-net calculation, and the clean copy was much easier to review than the old screenshot, so the file held up when I reopened it on another device.
Ngl, what I needed was a straightforward simple pay stub, not a complicated template; I entered the data slowly, then reopened the PDF to inspect the employee details, and the printout stayed readable without wasting space, so the second print looked exactly the way I wanted.
A cleaner simple pay stub made sense once the margins were cut off on an older print; I saved a draft, opened it again, and verified the PDF spacing, and the result was tidy enough for the training folder, so I finished the task sooner than expected; nothing looked wierd in the saved version.
Feedback by document
Start with the product you are considering.
Open a filtered review view, then follow the document link inside any review card when you are ready to examine that generator.
Review transparency
What the labels on this page mean.
The archive separates customer statements from PayStubCheck’s own representations. A customer’s experience does not guarantee that a document will be accepted by a landlord, lender, employer, government agency, or another recipient.
The source feedback record is marked as a verified purchase. Reviews without that designation remain visible without the badge.
The product label shown with each review identifies the document recorded in the customer feedback.
Review text expresses the customer’s own experience. PayStubCheck does not promise identical results or third-party acceptance.